This is achieved by carefully processing the callback to send the second operation after the completion of the first. Unfortunately, it is impossible to pass an arbitrary future on pool.submit, so an additional step is needed to combine the two futures.
Here is a possible implementation:
import concurrent.futures
def copy_future_state(source, destination):
if source.cancelled():
destination.cancel()
if not destination.set_running_or_notify_cancel():
return
exception = source.exception()
if exception is not None:
destination.set_exception(exception)
else:
result = source.result()
destination.set_result(result)
def chain(pool, future, fn):
result = concurrent.futures.Future()
def callback(_):
try:
temp = pool.submit(fn, future.result())
copy = lambda _: copy_future_state(temp, result)
temp.add_done_callback(copy)
except:
result.cancel()
raise
future.add_done_callback(callback)
return result
, copy_future_state asyncio.futures._set_concurrent_future_state.
:
from concurrent.futures import ProcessPoolExecutor
def wait(seconds):
time.sleep(seconds)
return seconds
pool = ProcessPoolExecutor()
future1 = pool.submit(wait, 5)
future2 = chain(pool, future1, wait)
future3 = pool.submit(wait, 10)