What am I missing without moving my ASP.NET 2.0 site to ASP.NET 3.5?

I have a web application using ASP.NET 2.0, and I want to know if I should move it to ASP.NET 3.5 in particular ... what am I missing without switching to ASP.NET 3.5?

I understand the disadvantages, but I do not understand the benefits.

What are the biggest benefits of migration / rewriting?

Will I get speed improvement?

Is MVC a lot easier than my old fashioned WebForm application?

Will it look cooler?

+5
source share
9 answers

You will miss access to newer .NET 3.5 libraries and cool syntax like LINQ and lambda expressions. Performance will be the same.

, ASP.NET MVC .NET 3.5... .

+5
+1

, MVC , WebForm. LINQ to SQL.

+1

, - . , , ! (, .)

+1

MVC, .net2 (monorail, promesh,...), mvc , .

, :

  • LINQ, LINQ2SQL
  • WCF
  • WF
+1

LINQ, . LINQ. , . ORM !

0

LINQ, LINQ to SQL ( ). LINQ to XML LINQ to Objects .

0

- FTW! Linq - .

0

All Articles