Geek Answers Handbook

Running a web application in Grails vs Django

I'm currently in the planning stage for a web application, and I'm trying to decide whether to use Grails or Django. In terms of work:

  • Which ecosystem is easier to maintain (migrations, backups, disaster recovery, etc.)? If using grails, this is likely to be typical tomcat + mysql on linux. If django will be apache + mysql on linux.

  • Do django or grails have the best choice of cheap and flexible hosting? Initially, this is likely to be low bandwidth. I'm not sure about the exact requirement, but from what I read, it seems that django will require much less server resources (even a server with 256 MB is fine) than grails.

+5
source share
5 answers

You can run grails in 256 megabytes. Many community members do this. That being said, I would say that on any platform you want a lot more sheep than to make sure your performer. But I can also recommend checking out www.linode.com. You can get high-quality hosting at a very reasonable price, and adding a little bar for the grail will not violate your budget. Also, if you are interested in cloud solutions, Morph offers Grails applications. http://developer.mor.ph/grails

Django, Java, libaries , grails. , , , , .

+9

Java apache nginx. Jetty , , www.mor.ph, , .

, 256 Ubuntu RapidXen, $10 .

Django, , (, ), oppinion

+5

, , . 256 , Grails. , Sun. , , . Layered Tech Ostatic.

+2

I think python has lower hosting requirements (i.e. grails needs jvm and most el-cheapo hosts don't provide one where they usually provide python support). In addition, the google engine supports django (to some extent).

But if you have a dough, grails is much better than imho.

0
source

More articles:


All Articles