Is TFS source control just augmented by VSS or is it significantly different?

My workplace is planning to move to Team Foundation Server, and it's not too soon - all to get away from cancer, which is Visual SourceSafe.

However, I have to ask: is the initial control in TFS much different (and better) than VSS, or is it just a “reinforced” version of the same?

I am asking about this now, as this is probably my last window to suggest something like Subversion.

+5
source share
6 answers

TFS 18 , , , ( TFS 2005 , , , ).

TFS 2008 SP1, . Visual Studio. , , , , , Subversion, , .

, - , TFS VSS. , !

, , , TFS , , SQL Server . , .

+7

TFS SQLServer. CVS SVN , TFS , . , , . , - GUI, , . . , . VSS.

+2

TFS VSS. TFS VSS - , .

TFS - . CI . SQL . SVN, SVNBridge. . TFS . .

VSS - , , , - , , ZIP , VSS.

+2

Sourcesafe .

TFS MS, . , , .

TFS 2006 , , , PEBCAK. .

+2

, ( ).

, . , ( ?).

TFS is much more than just source control. Task Management, Registration Policies, List

+1
source

I have no first experience with TFS, but I used both a secure source and svn. From what I read, your answers are yes and yes. You can definitely feel the story safe for the source, but at the same time it is a modern system with the features you expect and then some (it also works a lot with the project).

0
source

All Articles