Is Boost guilty of not looking like Boost?

I just read the introduction to Boost :: Spirit LL Parser. The preface suggests that the author and creator like to use such parsing technology for reading in program options. Does Boost not have its own library for program parameters?

I am wondering if the Boost committee is considering all the library notes for common themes and style? Each of them seems to have its own taste.

A little pen for other great software, I was just curious.

+5
source share
5 answers

Boost.Program-Options. Boost.Program-Options , , Spirit.

+10

, boost. - . , , / , . ( 3 Boost, () - _1, _2 ..).

, , . , , , "" .;)

+9

Boost : -)

+5

, , . ( Spirit) Program-Options , , Spirit. , , , , , . Spirit.

+3

There is no such thing as a Boost style committee. ISO WG21 will spend a little more time on the overall style, but even they managed to forget std :: ifstream :: ifstream ((std :: string const & filename)

+1
source

All Articles