Does Squeak support a namespace?

Question

So, I look at using Smalltalk / Squeak for several projects with hobbies / academic interests, and trying to read the language, I came across this good article . However, this paragraph stunned me a little:

“Unfortunately, there is a complete lack of standardization for providing or working with modules / packages in Smalltalk. Some dialects provide very strong and comprehensive support for modules / packages (including version control and distributed access by teams of development teams) and other dialects in this regard are few or none not so.Some dialects provide a robust implementation of many shared namespaces, while others do not.The only common feature is that when modules are provided / n Acts or namespaces, they are implemented as objects, just as classes and methods are implemented as objects created again.

So, I tried searching the site and it appears on the wiki wiki: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/734 . Does anyone know if this (or something similar) is part of the standard distribution?

Answer 1

According to Mew, this is not perceived as a big problem in the Squeak community. The prefix is ​​"good enough." Some time ago, I tried to do something better and still maintain the unique Smalltalk feel:

http://swiki.krampe.se/gohu/32

... , , , . , - , - , Smalltalk.

Answer 2

Squeak. . , , , . + +

Answer 3

Google Summer of Code , Environments. , , .

, , Squeak 4.5 .

Answer 4

Looks like you should check out Newspeak .