What wiki to use after MediaWiki?

We are going to move from our existing MediaWiki installation to something more feature-rich. I’m trying to find all the pains that people face with MediaWiki today (mostly this is the mistreatment of external documents and editing capabilities other than perfect) compared to the word Word.

We use wiki for development, specification, process guide. We have several external documents (docs, powerpoints) that we currently place in a shared folder and reference the wiki (because downloading files in MediaWiki is not very convenient). We are trying to minimize friction so that no one has an excuse or reason not to use it.

Some of the options we are considering are Confluence, Trac, and Sharepoint. Money is not a big problem, but ease of use (and maintenance) and completeness. What would you use?

+5
source share
9 answers

I would include the details of my specific functions in the excellent WikiMatrix selection wizard and give him recommendations.

+15
source

I would advise either

  • Foswiki ( http://foswiki.org ) (forked by the entire TWiki developer community to avoid trademark threats) is a multi-functional and fully open wiki programmer. Go to #foswiki at irc.freenode.net to chat with the community.
  • Mindtouch Deki Wiki (http://www.mindtouch.com/), , , , Office.

. Confluence ( html Wiki), wysiwyg, HTML- WYSIWYG, , (, foswiki html , wiki ). Confluence , atlassian JIRA ( ), .

- ( Google, jotspot, ).

Sharepoint, . - - IE, Sharepoint - braindead ( - - - Microsoft). , DMS Office, KT ( ). http://www.knowledgetree.com/. Sharepoint , ( MOSS, ) foswiki ( xml foswiki google)

... Google, promises -.

: foswiki.

+14

Wiki SharePoint. , SP .

+5

, Mediawiki, . IMO , , MW, . . http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Extensions

, , Word. Word, MS Word Wiki, Word.

, Semantic Mediawiki. .

+5

, Sharepoint. .

Trac, Trac .

Confluence, :

  • ( )
  • ( )
  • wiki ( )

, , , , , , . , , Foswiki, . , , Foswiki .

+3

Word Google Docs? , wiki, , .

, TWiki . , , .

+1

, , Confluence. . - , xwiki, - .

0

I would add FCK Editor for WYSIWYG, get a decent document management system that will work with the wiki and continue working with MediaWiki!

0
source

All Articles