Geek Answers Handbook

ASP.NET MVC, MonoDevelop and Windows

According to Miguel de Icaz ( here and here ) and the Lluis Sanchez Gual post ( here and here ), MonoDevelop for Windows will be ready soon. Personally, I am very interested in using MonoDevelop under Windows to develop open source projects for ASP.NET MVC. Yes, it’s better to work in MonoDevelop under Linux, but for many reasons I can’t just stop using Windows (one of these reasons is IIS7 - today it is much better for ASP.NET than for XSP).

Question N1: Does anyone try to try something in ASP.NET MVC using MonoDevelop on Windows when it is released?

Question N2: Are there any advantages to using MonoDevelop on Windows, and not in Visual Web Developer Express 2008?

Question N3: Both IDEs (MonoDevelop and VWD Express) are free, but which are actually preferable / better for open source development and why (is it very interesting for me)?

Edition:

Yes, I am using the full Visual Studio 2008 Pro and the excellent IDE. But it cannot be used for open source development - I think this is absurd. I really paid for it, but I cannot expect this from users of my library. Therefore, can I choose only Mono Develop or VWD Express? (see Question N3 )

thanks

+5
4

N1: MVC - Linux, .

N2: , . visual studio pro, , Mono-develop. , , -, , -.

N3: , , . , - Mono Vmware image . , , MVC . vmware vmware. Visual Studio pro, , resharper.

+3

N1: , , MonoDevelop ASP.NET MVC.

N2: - , , MonoDeveop - , , MonoDevelop, Mono. Visual Web Developer Express, MOMA , , / Mono.

N3: . MonoDevelop, , IDE , : (. N2) , /.

+3

VisStud , MonoDevelop auto-*. , . - VisStud Mono.

+2
source

N1: I did not use MVC, so I can not do anything. N2: MonoDevelop is similar to pro edition VS, but it does not have a good designer. But some important features, such as reports, are missing.
N3: For the Internet, my preference will be VWD, but for other things I will prefer MonoDevelop and SharpDevelop

+1
source

More articles:


All Articles