Good recent article on comparing Java EE and .NET?

I started exploring several larger server and application infrastructures that could support desktop client interfaces, as well as web interfaces, and actually nullified the two obvious ones: J2EE and .NET. In terms of language, point of view, point of view of portability, etc. I am very pleased to understand my two products. I will just say that, for the most part, it will either be in good enough shape with my initial assessment.

Somewhere pain, although it is in search of a good comparison with the engineers who spent most of the decade working with one, the other, or both. Undocumented frustrations you don’t get from Sun, Microsoft or a book.

A lot of results appear on a Google search, but most of them are from 2002-04. Suffice it to say, since then much has changed. J2EE seems to have become much simpler, and .NET is supposed to have gotten a lot more functionality.

Does anyone know of more current comparisons (over the past two years) that could be read?

+5
source share
4 answers

Since you say “desktop” before you said “web”, I can assume that the desktop side of this application is more important .. Net has a definite advantage in creating desktop applications, Java really does not have this as an advantage.

, , .

+5

Java EE, , . , , - Spring EJB3.

Spring Sun Java EE. Rod Johnson POJO, . Spring Java .NET. Hibernate, ORM.

EJB3 Spring Hibernate. EJB3 Glassfish JBOSS WebLogic.

, , - -. -, , Java EE .NET, . , back end. -, , Java .NET.

- -, Flex Silverlight. .

, .NET.

+1

" ".

, .NET. Java, Eclipse SWT Netbeans RCP Java Swing.

. Windows ( Linux), Java- , ( Bizspark).

Java- - J2EE. Spring. , - Java, Tomcat Spring, J2EE ( , , EJB).

EJB3 POJO, Spring.

-1

All Articles