I evaluate several open source message queuing technologies such as RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ, OpenAMQ, etc. My question is, what are the benefits of using commercial technologies like Tibco EMS, WebSphereMQ, Sonic, etc. instead of something like active or rabbit? PHP will be the main language, although Java systems will also interact.
I would say that the benefits are few and far between. You really need to be sure that the commercial system is for you before investing, as there is likely to be no return.
Some of these things are so esoteric, so prone to blocking the vendor, that damn heavy that you will feel that you have a gorilla on your back, and not just a monkey;)
, . , . , , . . , ActiveMQ. Progress Software SpringSource ActiveMQ, .
, . , ActiveMQ, . , , .. , , .
ActiveMQ . ActiveMQ API , C/++, Java,.NET, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby .
, RabbitMQ (, ). , , , .
, , - . / , ..
, , , .
, :
- - ActiveMQ , Apache, - .
If you use commercial products, it comes with everything (only we have), but all open source products will have basic functions, but still we can implement the commercial functions of the product (involves a lot of development)