Is it advisable to start with Python 3.1?

Possible duplicate:
Which version of Python should I use if I & rsquo; m new to python?

Is Python 3.1 advisable for beginners? Or are there any serious flaws that I would have to consider?

+5
source share
5 answers

3.1 is much simpler than 2.5 or 2.6, but currently there is a serious lack of third-party add-ins that support its environments (large applications that use it for scripting, etc.), and tools like the IDE. So, a lot depends on what you want to learn Python - if only for personal edification, 3.1 is perfect; if he actually creates or controls applications, websites, etc., then 2.5 or 2.6 will serve you better at the present time (he 3.*will undoubtedly reach and surpass 2.*in the future, but the future is not here yet; -.)

+17
source

Library support is a big problem until library developers develop their support for Python 3.x.

, , , Python 3.x:

, Python 3.x:

:

+4

Python Python 3.x. !

Python 3.x... , , , .

+3

, , , Python 2.x Python Python 3. , , , .

, , Python 3.x 2.x, .

+3

Python - . . , .., , .

-:

On the side note is that it is an interpreted language, i.e. there is no compiler / linker. So IMO, it's easier to start writing code.

+1
source

All Articles