Geek Answers Handbook

Disadvantages of WebFormsMVP?

While ASP.NET MVC seems to be a viable technology that many developers praise, I cannot find sufficient reason to devote my energy and time to this. The main reason is that I do not find enough .NET jobs that require it. Companies still use WebForms, and they are great for them. I do not do self-service, where I choose the technology that I like. I would rather use my time to improve my skills in SilverLight, JQuery, Javascript, SQL, LINQ, etc. Even Photoshop!

Therefore, I was interested in webformsmvp.com . I still use WebForms and using the best testing methods. Anyone with experience working with him can tell me they didn't like it?

+5
source share
4 answers

I think you will find that MVC training will ultimately prove useful, as it is really much simpler / cleaner than web forms, and in the future, people are likely to move in that direction ...

Third-party structures, although useful, are likely to never be as widespread in the labor market as some MS-supported frameworks.

+3
source

", , . , , .NET .NET".

, . Spring.NET NHibernate, ASP.NET MVC - , , . , - WWW-, ASP.NET. , WebForms MVP. ASP.NET MVC, MVP WebForms. , , -. , , , ASP.NET, -.

, Microsoft ASP.NET, - . .:)

: , ( ), CodePlex (http://webformsmvp.codeplex.com/). , .

ASP.NET MVC: .

+1

WebFormsMVP, .

, . , , Open Source.

WebFormsMVP .

- , / . (Microsoft, Oracle, Sun ..), , .

0

WebForms MCV - . MVP WebForms , , . , webformsmvp.com. , , . , .

There are other MVP frameworks for ASP.NET, one of which is the Microsoft Patterns and Practices group. Although P&P products are generally a bit more complex (since they are Enterprise Development oriented), you can take a look at the Composite Web Client Library .

0
source

More articles:


All Articles