Geek Answers Handbook

GraniteDS vs BlazeDS, which is more useful than the other?

Since I'm starting to discover this world,

I wonder which one is more useful for professional development.

Would you be kind enough to tell me to make some statistics?

+5
source share
4 answers

I am using BlazeDS. I know that GraniteDS exists, but BlazeDS meets my needs very well. It is well documented and durable. There is also an active Spring BlazeDS integration project , so I don't need an alternative.

+3
source

BlazeDS - Adobe. GraniteDS - .

--, , .

, BlazeDS, , , GraniteDS, , .

+1

.. , BlazeDS 3: 1. , . , ( Adobe, Cairngorm , ), , .

+1

BlazeDS .

, -10 . , "" "".

My personal opinion is that Adobe should better position itself as a front-end defacto for Java (Swing and SWT stink). BlazeDS is too clumsy to support this task. This is a beast from time to time.

This contradicts the fact that BlazeDS is not considered "open source" because the source code is open. I often look at this in our project. So GraniteDS is supported by a large number of people, but this is not always good.

0
source

More articles:


All Articles