How to compare CPG Corosync, ZeroMQ and Spread for messaging?

Question

I'm interested in:

• Performance
  • Delay
  • Throughput
  • Resource usage (CPU, memory, ...)
• High availability
  • No single point of failure
• Features
  • Vehicle Settings
  • Routing options
• Sustainability
• Users
  • Active development
  • Widely used
  • Useful mailing list, forum, IRC channel, ...
• Easy integration with my current codebase
• Possibly gotchas
• Any other thing you think I missed

I read about them, but I could not find a good comparison. I'm specifically interested in performance tests comparing them. (Maybe I should do it on my own, hopefully not.)

Answer 1

, , ZeroMQ. -, .

, TCP, CPU . . , ( , - ). RabbitMQ -, ZMQ 2 . , , .

RabbitMQ . - ,

SPOF

, . . , - . , , . ZeroMQ, , SPOF.

( ) - , . ZeroMQ promises , . JSON, , , , .

AMQP . , , ZeroMQ , .

( Python) . , , , . / . , .

: - 2.1 , .

Community

20 , , , . - ?

, ( ), . TCP, ( , , 128 , , ).

Gotchas

, . (: PUB (SUB) . , ).

- , , .

. , ( ++), .