I was thinking about the upcoming “revolution” in UI design and metaphors for interacting with a computer through a graphical interface, and I am surprised that as long as computers are accessible through a graphical interface, programmers are still looking for a better way to let the user interact with their programs . It seems like most work centers around aesthetics (which I understand are important), but I don’t understand why we are still looking for the magic bullet in the user interface design.
My question is: why the design and user interface components are not a solvable problem with accepted and understandable approaches?
, , , ( ) , . , "", . "" , , , ( , ).
-
, . .
. Windows 7 (, ), . , , - .
(, .)
. , . " " " ", .
. , ? CS , ? , ?
- .
Microsoft Office: , , . , , ? Microsoft , , - , , , , , , . ( )
? , , .
, . , . " Apple" . (!) ( !), , . .
, , , .
, , . , .
, Bugatti Veryon , , . Prius, .
- , ( , ) , , , .
, , , , , ( , .. , - )
, , , , .
, .
http://ux.stackexchange.com. ..
, . - . : . 30 . . 30 . . 30 . . 30 . . 30 .
. , , , .
The user interface design is to make people who have less knowledge about it, but can easily understand the application and use it comfortably. This is a major user interface design problem. Thus, it develops just like a robot. There is no end to perfect design. Since this makes it easy for users to use, this is an ideal design.