Comparison of syntax between moxian and rhinoceros

My company is trying to decide whether we will standardize Moq, Rhino Mocks or MS Moles and Stubs.

I know Rhino Mocks, Moles and Stubs well. But I am not familiar with Mok. How does the syntax work? Does it support Arrange Act Assert (AAA), like Rhino Mocks (I heard they created it, but I'm not sure). Does it have a strong seal?

Basically, I'm leaning towards Rhino Mocks (using Moles where necessary). But I do not want to do this just because I am familiar with Rhino Mocks. If Moq is actually better or (more importantly) easier to use, then I want to study it and choose one.

So, is there someone who has used both and feels that gives me a syntactic comparison?

+5
source share
3 answers

I made a multi-page blog series about the differences between several mocking frameworks. Feel free to check it out at http://www.richard-banks.org/2010/07/mocking-comparison-part-1-basics.html

+6
source

Have you looked at http://code.google.com/p/moq/wiki/QuickStart ?

Moq supports AAA and strong typing (using lambda)

+5
source

This project compares many layout frames with each other: funny comparison frames

0
source

All Articles