I am surprised that over the years, I pretend to simplify communication or software development, and after a few years, he claims that he was too redesigned. EJB, SOAP, therefore, looking at all WCF products, are we really needed as users (and not as Microsoft or IBM who need to sell new products)?
Update: this is a specific example
http://www.go4answers.com/Example/expert-interoperability-issues-ws-736.aspx The
guy knows how to call the server with WS-Security using the old soap, and in WCF it seems like this really doesn't help, and worst of all seems even more complicated, as said:
"WCF still has some limitations - not all WS-Security settings are possible without special development."
No one seems to have found a solution.
Thus, people instead of simple opinions give specific examples (with source code both in wcf and in soap or for comparison for comparison) of complex problems (and not simple problems) that can be solved by WCF easier than it can be with traditional soap ?
source
share