I recently read this article: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/09/25/svn-strikes-back-a-serious-vulnerability-found/
The developers of many popular sites, such as apache.org, php.net (http://ru2.php.net/.svn/entries), classmates.com and Russian Yandex use SVN, but do not follow the recommendations given by SVN (use the command export)
export
So, what reasons are not used svn exportinstead of updating the public copy, like all they do?
svn export
, , , / .svn (Apache2 IIS) , , , ,
.svn
:
, SVN -, , .svn , . , , .
, SVN UPDATE , , , ( ), mixups , . PLUS, , SVN , , , , , .
SVN UPDATE
, , , svn. , , , , . , , , " ", , ...
svn export , . .
(, PHP). .svn, , , , svn up.
svn up