Geek Answers Handbook

Why doesn't C ++ go over to an “unversioned model” like HTML / HTML5?

First, I must say that I am writing this from the bottom of my dark, envious heart:

After reading this: http://blog.whatwg.org/html-is-the-new-html5

I wonder what happened with the fact that C ++ has become so strong that it will take them 10 years to get a new standard.

I mean, built-in / ancient platforms don’t even notice when a new version of the C ++ standard appears, because guess what? they are limited to the platform and compiler providers, so for the most part they will not be able to use the new features in any case. Thus, all this tug of weight seems more self-immolated than a desire or respect for backward compatibility and the like.

+5
source share
2 answers

I wonder what happened with the fact that C ++ has become so strong that it will take them 10 years to get a new standard.

Wait. How long did it take for HTML to get the new standard again?

The cases of HTML5 and C ++ 0x are very close to each other. Both take age to formalize (both of them do not exist yet), as a result of which both can be legally qualified as utilities.

But in both cases, no one cares: the upcoming standards are already mostly implemented in modern browsers / compilers.

And what exactly are you complaining about?

+12
source

@Konrad, ++ ISO , ISO. . HTML ISO , , .

+1

More articles:


All Articles