Rails Ruby Gems vs. Clean Development for Rich Blogging

Question

Some ruby ​​stones, such as jekyll, toto, and webby, offer built-in blog type integration to your ruby ​​app. Another way to develop an application with a rich web block is to create and simulate the application yourself using pure ruby ​​and rail methods. (for example, creating a model of articles and users). The first sentences out of the box show that the second option offers more settings and controls.

In the experience of people overflowing a stack, which would be the best route, and what would people think when they decided to use a gem out of the box against loneliness?

Answer 1

All the gems you mentioned take static, discounted / textile / etc files and turn them into HTML sites. They use different approaches to this, and jekyll splashes out a ready-made website for hosting, toto does the conversion and routing on demand, and webby does the same as jekyll.

If you use Rails, it is important to note that none of them will be well integrated into your application. They are designed for more or less independent work.

, , . , Wordpress Drupal, , , , , .. , , , .

, Rails, , Rails , .

Answer 2

Rails , .

, , , .

, API- gem , , , , . , .

: ? , ? , , . , , , , . .

.