ORM - . , , :), . ORM , . 2 :
- ( ), ..,
, . , .
- , ORM, , , , , - ORM:)
- ORM, " " , ORM . , ORM , ORM ( ) 10 ( , )? , . , - NOSQL.
In my opinion, ORM is only alive thanks to the framework that uses it internally. And performance? I'm not sure (since I don't use it anymore), but I believe that performance can be a problem too. Do you have to pay at least some price for correctly rejecting the database query? I think ORM was a great idea on paper, but it just doesn't work well.
source
share