Should we tag our SVN repo after each successful CI build?

Tags in SVN are cheap. Are they cheap enough so that we can flag every successful build that appears from our CI window (TeamCity, if that matters)?

+5
source share
2 answers

My answer is no. This is not an SVN specification, it's just great practice.

CI lines should not increase build or version numbers - it's just a performance test that everything builds (hey, this may not start , though). There is no point marking the CI assembly.

Edit:

QA CI

QA CI, , , CI- (.. , , Release Debug ..). , CI , , , .
, CI, , , . , , . , , QA , "CI build" ( ).


:

: " CI- ?". , , SO. , , , CI- . , , . , , .

Wikipedia:

, , . , , , , .

:

- , , , , , , . ( ) .

, , CI . , .

, , CI. CI , , - , , .

, , , CI- , Release/QA Release QA. , , QA , - , , QA .

< > , QA, CI. programers.stackexchange.com . >

+8

Subversion , .

, .

+3

All Articles