Why HTML5 doesn't apply a sticky footer tag

Question

I am currently playing with sticky footers and encountering regular links as indicated in Q: Why is the position not used: fixed for sticky. footnote?

While I'm glad that these fixes exist, I am curious to know why the footer problem has not been addressed in the HTML5 reengineering style. Semantic problems aside, the web document author would expect the footer to have a default behavior, that is, be a “sticky footer”: stay at the bottom of the page if the content of the page is larger.

I feel like this is a missed opportunity to end up with a lot of hacks and would like to know what the reasons were for not attributing the “sticky” behavior to the footer tag.

Answer 1

HTML5 does not define HTML layout. This works CSS.

I'm not sure any layout you described has ever been considered for CSS, so I'm not sure what the pros and cons are.

CSS layouts usually do not allow you to link to a browser window other than position: fixed;that Internet Explorer does not support in version 6, so I assume that there are problems associated with the implementation of such layout features. I like to hear from everyone who knows some of the features.

, <footer> arent - <section> . , /.