Has anyone used a coding-free software development system?

Question

I found a software development system that is currently free to use and develop.

This system is completely code-like, and you can easily develop business-oriented applications using its own graphical interface and a bit of MDA. Website: http://www.codeless.com/

But, unfortunately, this is in Dutch.

I would like to know if anyone has used this product?

How effective is this approach and product?

Is it possible to develop non-expensive applications?

Answer 1

I looked at the site, but the story is very vague.

For most non-Dutch speakers, I have translated the following text:

Klaar voor de toomomst!

Stele with over 20 spring horses Software dezelfde zou kunnen gebruiken als nu. Toekomstmuziek? Nou, welcome uw toekomst dan. You want without a horse Technology ontwikkelt software zonder code die simpelweg niet veroudert.

Door with reverse "kunnen wij u laten zien hoe uw software-pakket er in Codeless uit komt te zien. En door interfaces gebruik te maken van, kunnen we bepaalde delen van uw systeem vervangen zonder dat er een There is a big explosion for knockout.

Wij hebben een manier gevonden om onze software for altijd mee te laten gaan. Omdat we het simpelweg zonde van uw tijd vinden om telkens opnieuw uw bedrijfsprocessen te moeten uitleggen aan een nieuwe ICT-leverancier.

The Uw system is the perfect aangesloten op uw bedrijfsprocessen. En dat terwijl u de nieuwste technologieën snel en voordelig in kunt zetten om zo concurrentievoordeel te behalen. Natuurlijk moet u updaten. Maar met the software die u nu door ons laat bouwen, bent u gegarandeerd klaar voor de toekomst!

It means:

Ready for the future!

Imagine that you use the same software after 20 years. Impossible? No, welcome to your future. Because Codeless Technology creates software without code that does not age.

Under the “reverse machine” we show you your software in Codeless. Using interfaces, we can replace some parts of your system without the need for a big bang.

We found a way to allow the software forever, because we think it’s a waste of time to explain your business processes to your ICT provider again and again.

Your system is perfectly connected with your business processes. Yet you can use the latest technology quickly and easily, so you have an edge over your competitors. Of course, you still have a need for Updates. But with our software you are guaranteed in the future.

It seems that they have developed a product that uses the existing system and creates a new one, using the old system as a guide. Without the need to write code. It looks great, but I have serious doubts.

My first question is: if they are so excellent, why is their site not in English?

Answer 2

I am not familiar with this particular product, but I have some familiarity with a “theory” (such as it) without code development.

Primitives of programming languages ​​exist for some reason. Thus, there is a tendency to the gradual accumulation of functions that correspond to primitives of programming languages: “code” or “mouse-based” development systems: something similar to function calls (for reusing design fragments), links to parameters inside functions, then , that loop, conditional branching, things that combine several actions into one action, things that perform arithmetic or string operations, etc. At this point, they end with the same problems as all development systems, which all stem from the trend, users must press the envelope in search of more complex problems to solve. Therefore, they need refactoring and other nice features of the IDE style that will help them cope with complexity - by that time the “codeless” difference is more related to marketing than to the actual user interface.

We even see this trend in many attempts to “start over” with a new set of primitives in the text source language. Haskell does not really eliminate stateful procedural coding. It has a way to imitate features that taste pretty authentic, because if it weren’t, users would try to imitate it themselves and make a mistake.

Answer 3

I read on my website.

It seems to me that they create software for you that they claim can easily be expanded. I don’t see that they claim that you can use your software to create your own software without using code. Their concept in their words:

Maatwerksoftware, die nooit veroudert, die u zelf kunt onderhouden én uitbreiden en die bovendien wordt gemaakt waar u bij staat.

I.e:

Software created in accordance with your requirements that never grow old so that you can support yourself, and what else you do while watching.

I conclude that they are building it, not you.

Answer 4

I used the visual development tool C Control microcontroller. Although you could use almost all the features of the base language (BASIC), it showed that it was a waste of time. Mouse coding simple loops took longer than writing simple BASIC code.

During my first steps in coding and development, I tried other products (mainly game creators), but they always either did not have functions that are usually available in a coded language, or very slow to work with.

But in recent years, I have noticed an increase in people who no longer want to read the (natural) text, which they cannot understand the first time they read it. Just one subordinate sentence, and they do not want to continue.

Thus, I assume that there is a market for these disinterested development tools, as you can easily get results, and the learning curve is much lower. I used most of the tools where it’s pretty clear.

IMHO without a code development environment are best suited for

• beginners
• people who do not want to learn coding.

Answer 5

This approach looks great, worth your attention. Despite the fact that it is still at an experimental stage: http://subtextual.org/subtext2.html

Answer 6

The results of the "code" or "graphical" systems that I saw always turn out to not reduce the real complexity, with flaws without joint efforts, cont diff / patch, they can not compare the version, enable source control, etc.

In short, just not thought out.

I bet they don't scale well for large datasets.

Answer 7

I have tested version 1 of version 2 currently. But since there is no documentation in English, I am a little puzzled by how we can promote our applications in accordance with our requirements.

Presented samples looked impressive.

Answer 8

Only my two cents, an idea without code development, not only for beginners / people who do not want to learn coding, but can also be used to teach programming to younger children and use it as a medium for storytelling.

Of course, I refer to Alice .

He has a market, but I don’t see him doing traditional programming (for example, typing on the keyboard) because of him clunkiness.

Answer 9

The corresponding position with such products is extreme skepticism. I clearly remember this ...

The last one

What was the product released in 1981 (!) That claimed that programmer redundancy created commercial applications without codes.

However, I currently use a non-code development environment - Wirefusion - to create 3D interactive Java applets. This is very good, but it is aimed at a very clearly defined domain and there are even some problems.

Answer 10

At the end of the 80s there was Borland ObectVision.

You can download a copy from the opt-out site .

Answer 11

Something like Scratch or Lego MindStorms is what comes to mind when you think of empty software. But it seems like helping someone encode instead of being 100% without code. And I think that this will work so as not to be so restrictive. Over time, like all languages ​​/ APIs, it will improve, and more and more people will get their own coding block encoders to make it more versatile. No matter what happens, although I would always like to tweak all the generated codes, similar to the WYSIWYG HTML editor. At first it will be difficult, but over time it will only get better. But no matter what, manual coding will always prevail.

Answer 12

Reply to geocar .. (I can’t reply anymore to my own post)

To say what differences with other I4GLs is difficult, because I do not know all the tools there, but let me say so. If you compare Codeless with MS CRM 4.0 and Microsoft M, what do you think are the differences with I4GL tools?

Answer 13

The proof is in the pudding; I do not understand why this Bernard deleted who we are. If Charles Simoni, a former ex-Microsoft billionaire Billionaire who had been trying to do the same for 15 years, would comment here, would he be removed? David Roth, lead viewer, Simparel, Inc. David. Mouth at Simparel dot com.

Answer 14

My boss has a good way to generate applications without having to write code. He has an automatic programmer (s) writing it for him. It uses a domain-specific language and gets a working application. Everything that does the same job should be about as smart (or dumb) as that.

When requirements are transferred, a character language is used, whether it is keyboard clicks, mouse clicks, or any other form of input.

If the language is well displayed in user concepts and allows very little room for misinterpretation or inconsistencies, then this is a good domain-specific language.

It’s good to try to find the best domain languages.
It’s bad to try to sell if you don’t have one.

Answer 15

So, I think there is a market for these kind of selfless development tools, because you can easily get results and the learning curve is much lower. The most tools that I used where pretty self-explanatory.

IMHO without code development are best suited for

novice people who do not want to know the encoding

This is exactly the same - and what is achieved using the development platform without code formation neatComponents.

Take a look at www.clearString.com, which is designed for these users.

David

Answer 16

Encanvas is completely barren. It was originally created during the day to create enterprise-class enterprise applications, but in the last decade it has been used to create some kind of application such as replacing tables in regional traffic systems, business intelligence platforms and e-learning applications.

encanvas is not cheap. It is designed so that IT teams can opt out of coding and come with all the necessary tools, including cloud deployment.

encanvas is built on .net.