How about this:
<?php abstract class Model_Abstract { protected $_gatewayName = null; protected $_gateway = null; protected function _init() { $this->_gateway = new $this->_gatewayName(); } protected function __construct($row = null) { $this->_init(); if ($row) { $this->_data = $row; } } public static function getAbstract($class, $param) { $model = new $class(); if($param instanceof Zend_Db_Table_Row_Abstract) { $row = $param; } elseif(is_numeric($param)) { $row = $model->_gateway->find($param)->current(); } return new $class($row); } public static function getAbstractCollection($class, $param = null) { $model = new $class(); if($param instanceof Zend_Db_Table_Rowset_Abstract) { $rowset = $param; } elseif($param === null) { $rowset = $model->_gateway->fetchAll(); } $array = array (); foreach ($rowset as $row) { $array[] = new $class($row); } return $array; } abstract public static function get($param); abstract public static function getCollection($param = null); } class Model_Company extends Model_Abstract { protected $_gatewayName = 'Model_Table_Company'; public static function get($param) { return self::getAbstract(__CLASS__, $param); } public static function getCollection($param = null) { return self::getAbstractCollection(__CLASS__, $param); } } class Model_Table_Company extends Zend_Db_Table_Abstract { protected $_name = 'company'; } $model = Model_Company::get(1); print "Got an object of type ".get_class($model)."\n"; $models = Model_Company::getCollection(); print "Got ".count($models)." objects of type ".get_class($models[0])."\n"; ?>
Unfortunately, to make functions convenient to call, you need to duplicate get() and getCollection() in each subclass. Another option is to call the function in the parent class:
$model = Model_Abstract::getAbstract('Model_Company', 1); print "Got an object of type ".get_class($model)."\n"; $models = Model_Abstract::getAbstractCollection('Model_Company'); print "Got ".count($models)." objects of type ".get_class($models[0])."\n";
You can rename the base class and its function names if you want to go this route. But the fact is that you must name the child class in one place or another : either make the template function in the child class, as in my first example, or name the class in a string, as in my second example.
source share