What version of flexmojos should i use?

I recently reorganized the Adobe AIR project as a maven project so that I can connect to my continuous integration server. Most of the information I found to get her work came from various blogs, which, apparently, are the only way to get to the flexible material.

When I decided which super-pomp to inherit, I found that there are many different flexmojos superplumes that different people use.

Here are a few I found (each one is used by some examples in the wild)

What is the difference between the various superpomies and the de facto standard?

+4
source share
1 answer

Velo has moved the flexmojos code base to Sonatype, we are currently updating the site. Until the site is ready, you can read the latest information on Flexmojos in the Sonatype Forge quiz: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/FLEXMOJOS/Home

There is a website for flexmojos at http://flexmojos.sonatype.org

Flexmojos chapter in Maven: the final guide is still under development, but if you read it, you'll notice that there is a big difference between previous versions of Flexmojos and the newer version 3.0. Namely, you can depend on the repository hosted on repository.sonatype.org to get all the necessary Flex open source artifacts.

What is the difference between super-POM? The quick answer is that the upcoming release 3.1 (this week) is about to move away from using super POM to add to all plugin information. Using typed Super POMs is not compatible with how most organizations use Maven. Typically, a project has a top-level corporate POM or POM. With the release of Flexmojos 3.1, you'll see more stand-alone POMs from the flexmojos archetypes that will allow you to integrate Flexmojos projects into larger and more complex multi-module Maven projects.

+5
source

All Articles