What is the difference between building WSDL in Eclipse and using WCF?

I am a little familiar with WCF in that I can create web services in VS.Net ... I understand some concepts ...

But, the other day I bought this option in Eclipse (I also use Java for coding) to create WSDL. Playing with him, he looks great, since he has a GUI method for building himself.

I think I just want to know what the difference is.

1) Are they different technologies like WSDL vs WCF? Or that WCF uses WSDL?

2) I read that WSDL is a top-down approach ... so what about WCF, is it top-down or is it bottom-up?

3) Will this WSDL in Eclipse really generate CSharp code for my server and client efficiently or will it need a lot of fixes?

+4
source share
1 answer
  • Windows Communication Framework and other services use standards, such as the web service definition language, to convey specifications.

  • WSDL is neither top nor bottom up. You can do it anyway; that is, you can create your interface using WSDL and then encode your WSDL service, or you can design your application and use a tool like the ones built into Visual Studio and Eclipse to automatically create WSDL. There are pros and cons (both supporters and opponents) for both approaches.

  • IDEs such as Visual Studio and Eclipse usually do a good job (perhaps better than people) to generate WSDL. I have not used the Eclipse plugin for C # (I assume that there is one thing that you use if you want to generate C # in Eclipse), so I can not talk about its functionality.

    / li>

EDIT: I answered question 3 back, but the answer still applies. WSDL code generators also usually do a good job, like WSDL code generators.

+4
source

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/1312473/


All Articles