I’m not sure about a specific issue, but I talk in detail with a person and listen to how they choose their words, build their sentences and interact with you, this is a good way to assess the basic communication skills that often translate into written messages.
For example, select a technical topic that the candidate knows well, and ask them to describe in detail some aspects of the topic. Listen to exactly how they choose their descriptions and how relevant the words they actually choose. The requirements of documents are often implemented literally by developers, so it is important that the terms and words used by the authors are correct. "Words have meanings" - use them correctly. :)
Something else to listen to is the frequent use of generic, vague, or broad terms. Translated into a requirements document, this will lead to confusion, conflicts in requirements and time spent clearing up. Most companies have a common diction or "jargon." writers must learn, but if you lack the discipline to learn and use the descriptions correctly, then this will not make your writing good.
Finally, ask clarifying questions during the conversation and watch if their answer is simply a rephrased version of what they originally said, or if they change gears and refine using a new angle. Since we do not all see things the same way, the ability to rephrase the concept to be more understandable to a particular listener is very useful for clarification sessions. In an interview or discussion, you are a listener, and a good requirements writer should be able to help you understand what they are saying.
source share