Let the subordinate catch up with the master
Assume that the slave catches up with the leading value of the slave by 0 seconds behind the master.
This means that replication stopped at some point (to modify the table),
It will record the latest replication time.
When replication resumes,
it will compare the current record with the master with the last replication time on the slave.
However, the procedures look like a flaw .
You cannot change slavery and the pending scheme in the updated slave is the same as master .
In the event column, the value has changed, the column is omitted,
could potentially cause replication failure.
source share