Both instruments have track records at the level you mark, 2-4K users. Where rubber meets the road, it is the labor necessary to deliver test X in quality Y, including a detailed analysis. If you are learning both tools, then you should consider POC in your application.
Document your script and the required level of analysis regardless of any tool, and then hire an expert to run POC according to your requirements. Time all tasks, even before asking people to enter the time at the start of the task and the time at the end of the task in your documentation. Compare both time and output at the end of the POC.
You should know that when you go to the market to get an expert for any tool, the level of hard skills fraud in the market for testing performance is about 97% (or higher). You want to hire someone with the strongest and longest experience working with the tool in question with many links, otherwise you will probably get a terribly distorted view of the capabilities and effectiveness of one or both tools, which are likely to lead to the choice of the tool.
Expect to hire skills that you may not have in your home for any tool. Many believe that a performance testing tool accounts for 85-90% of the skills needed to perform performance testing. In fact, the opposite is indeed true, with the skills of the tool working from 10 to 15% of the skills (critical skills) necessary for success.
source share