It is interesting.
Recently, I recently spoke with one of our clients who asked me about “flexible” SSL and suggested that we (Incapsula) also offer this option.
After some discussion, we both came to the conclusion that such a function would be misleading, as it would provide the end user with a false sense of security, as well as exposing the site owner to liability.
Simply put, a visitor on one of the “flexible” SSL connections can feel completely secure after encryption and will provide confidential data, not knowing that the “server for clouds” route is not encrypted at all and can be intercepted (that is, backdoor shells )
It was interesting to visit here and see that others reach the same conclusion. +1
Please be aware that as the owner of the website, you can be held responsible for any undesirable effects that this setting may cause.
My suggestion is to do the crucial thing and invest in an SSL certificate or even create a self-signed one (use the cloud to server encryption for the route).
source share