When working with legacy tables, you need to create a CompositeId based on two char (3) fields. I don't see the overloads that make this possible with Fluent.
The mapping I'm trying is as follows:
CompositeId()
.KeyProperty(x => x.LegacyEntity1Id, "LegacyEntity1Id")
.KeyProperty(x => x.LegacyEntity2Id, "LegacyEntity2Id");
Map(x => x.LegacyEntity1Id).CustomSqlType("char(3)");
Map(x => x.LegacyEntity2Id).CustomSqlType("char(3)");
I also tried:
CompositeId()
.KeyReference(x => x.LegacyEntity1, "LegacyEntity1Id")
.KeyReference(x => x.LegacyEntity2, "LegacyEntity2Id");
Map(x => x.LegacyEntity1Id).CustomSqlType("char(3)");
Map(x => x.LegacyEntity2Id).CustomSqlType("char(3)");
Both results lead to the same result - the table is generated with the corresponding composite identifier, but both columns are standard nvarchar (255). As a result, foreign keys are not generated, and I get an exception, since the parent tables are char (3).
Is it impossible to display through Fluent?
If not, is there any real difference in displaying it like this: * / <>
Id(x => x.Id).GeneratedBy.Identity();
Map(x => x.LegacityEntity1Id).CustomSqlType("char(3)");
Map(x => x.LegacityEntity2Id).CustomSqlType("char(3)");
References(x => x.LegacityEntity1).Column("LegacityEntity1Id").UniqueKey("1").Not.Nullable();
References(x => x.LegacityEntity2).Column("LegacityEntity2Id").UniqueKey("1").Not.Nullable();
* (, ), ETLed SQL.
? HasManyToMany , ( ).