I have a third-party closed source library, created as a windows dll, created using visual studio 2010. First, I planned to create an extension module for this DLL, for example, SWIG. However, this is spoiled by the fact that it was built with VS 2010, while all python 2 distributions are built with VS 2008.
Now it seems that ctypes does not have this limitation. I built a trivial DLL using VS 2010 (the dependent walker shows what the dll is connected to msvcr100.dll) using the function:
int fnTestLib2(int a, int b)
{
return a+b;
}
loaded it in ctypes and
fcn = mydll.fnTestLib2
fcn.argtypes = [ctypes.c_int, ctypes.c_int]
fcn.restype = ctypes.c_int
print fcn(1,2)
prints correctly 3.
Now I'm a bit confused: Is it just because I was lucky and because the example is trivial or is there a fundamental difference in the base method ctypesand the extension module? If so, what is it ?;)
: ctypes DLL ?
, distutils Windows SDK.
, bla.pyd, .
, c runtimes . :
