Geek Answers Handbook

Mule ESB vs. Spring Integration

The Mule ESB project explains its difference from Spring Integration on its website. However, for the dcterms.date of the 2012-07-19T18:43-03:00 document, the text may be outdated.

The main points of the cited paragraph are

  • "Spring Integration takes an" application-oriented "integration approach."
  • "Instead of implementing a common bus [...], Spring Integration aims to provide" small "ESB-style integration for specific applications."
  • "Spring Integration is best suited for situations where you need to integrate a small number of components, usually inside."
  • "[Spring Integration has] a very small number of supported transports and available transformers."
  • "[Spring] Integration is intentionally limited to small-scale integration in the context of the Spring Portfolio."

Are these items still valid? Is there a more detailed and, if so, relevant comparison?

ESB Mule vs Spring Integration

Recently, a new component called Spring Integration has been added to Spring Portfolio that allows you to create and manage EIS-like functions and EIP in the Spring Framework. Spring Integration uses the so-called "application-oriented" integration approach.
, , , , Spring Integration , "" ESB EIP, . - Spring Integration , , , Spring. - , , , Spring Integration .
Mule ESB Spring , Mule ESB - ESB - . , Spring Integration Spring Portfolio, Mule , , SOA, .

+7
1

: Spring Integration project 5 .

, Spring Integration , ESB. , -, Spring Integration, () /.

POJO /; - / , POJO ( !).

, Spring XD Project.

, DZone , Spring, .

+16

More articles:


All Articles