I have the following test:
@RunWith(Enclosed.class)
public class ProductTest {
@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
@Ignore
public static abstract class Base1 {
@Before
public void setUpBase() {...}
}
public static class Test1 extends Base1{
@Test
public void foo(){...}
}
}
public static class Test2 extends Base1{
@Test
public void bar(){...}
}
}
}
To avoid @Ignore, I reorganized the class as follows:
@RunWith(Enclosed.class)
public class ProductTest {
@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public static class Test1 extends Base1 {
@Test
public void foo() {...}
}
@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public static class Test2 extends Base1 {
@Test
public void bar() {...}
}
}
abstract class Base1 {
@Before
public void setUpBase() {...}
}
But I see an error:
java.lang.Exception: Class Base1 should be public
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.validatePublicVoid(FrameworkMethod.java:91)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.validatePublicVoidNoArg(FrameworkMethod.java:70)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.validatePublicVoidNoArgMethods(ParentRunner.java:133)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.validateInstanceMethods(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:165)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.collectInitializationErrors(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:104)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.validate(ParentRunner.java:355)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.<init>(ParentRunner.java:76)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.<init>(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
at org.mockito.internal.runners.JUnit45AndHigherRunnerImpl$1.<init>(JUnit45AndHigherRunnerImpl.java:23)
1. Please clarify the cause of the problem 2. Please advise me on an elegant way to avoid the following error.
I want to encapsulate the logic in a single file.
source
share