Possible Duplicate:Floating Point Inaccuracy Examples
double a = 0.3; std::cout.precision(20); std::cout << a << std::endl;
result: 0.2999999999999999889
double a, b; a = 0.3; b = 0; for (char i = 1; i <= 50; i++) { b = b + a; }; std::cout.precision(20); std::cout << b << std::endl;
result: 15.000000000000014211
So, a is less than it should be. But if we take “50 times”, the result will be more than it should be.
Why is this? And how to get the right result in this case?
To get the correct results, do not set the accuracy more than is available for this number type:
#include <iostream> #include <limits> int main() { double a = 0.3; std::cout.precision(std::numeric_limits<double>::digits10); std::cout << a << std::endl; double b = 0; for (char i = 1; i <= 50; i++) { b = b + a; }; std::cout.precision(std::numeric_limits<double>::digits10); std::cout << b << std::endl; }
5000 50, - , .
?
, 0,3 - 0,01001100110011001... , 1/3, 0,3333333... . 0.3, 0.29999999999999999988897769753748434595763683319091796875 ( 53 ).
0.3
, , , , . :
- .
, , 0,30 0,30 , . .
15 , "". , .
, .
, , 0,3, . , , , 0.33333 1⁄3.
0.33333
1⁄3
, , .
, , "0,3" .
"" - 20 .
"" ,
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrary-precision
http://speleotrove.com/decimal