In connection with this issue, While preserving the closure in HashMap , I learned that the correct passage of closures on a function requires that the function be general and accept any type that implements the Fn, FnMut, or FnOnce function.
When implementing part of a library from C ++ as a training exercise, I need a type of abstraction like this.
use std::collections::HashMap;
struct Event;
trait IObject {
fn makeFunc<F : FnMut(&Event)>(&mut self, s : &str, f : F);
}
struct Object1<'a> {
m_funcs : HashMap<String, Box<FnMut(&Event) + 'a>>
}
impl <'a> Object1<'a> {
fn new() -> Object1<'a> {
Object1 {m_funcs : HashMap::new()}
}
}
impl <'a> IObject for Object1<'a> {
fn makeFunc<F : FnMut(&Event) + 'a>(&mut self, s: &str, f: F) {
self.m_funcs.insert(String::from_str(s), Box::new(f));
}
}
fn main() {
let obj : &IObject = &Object1::new();
println!("Hello, world!");
}
However, the returned error indicates that IObject cannot be a sign object, since it contains a method with common parameters. However, to completely close the function of a function, I need generics. Can someone show me how to achieve the abstraction I'm looking for, but can still go through the closure of functions?