Geek Answers Handbook

Should I do a git hit after the function finishes using the git thread?

I use bitbucket and control with gitflow (or try).

My problem is this: I create my function and I did

git-flow feature finish name

So, in the tutorial that I read, I had to do it

git push origin :feature/name

Before that, on a bitbucket, I could see the branch, after the start of git push was deleted, why?

After the function completes, you should run this push origin?

I'm really confused.

Greetings

+4
source share
1 answer

Before that, on a bitbucket, I could see the branch, after the start of git push was deleted, why?

The command git-flow feature finish namedeletes the branch on your computer, and the bitbucket deletes the branch after you click on the new update (deleting the branch) on the bitbucket.

After the function completes, you should run this push origin?

, , . , , , , .

:

? HEAD?

, "" , develop, feature/ . HEAD.

git -flow, ?

. (, github - )

git -flow, bitbucket, , ? , ?

, git push origin :feature/name, ( ) . , .

, , git -flow, , 0.1 0,2 .., ? , ?

. git -flow , .

, , , gitflow, , fork ?

, . git-flow - git. feature/, release/ . git, .

+5

More articles:


All Articles