I would not change my approach, but to answer your question:
lol = [[1,3],[3,4]]
from operator import setitem
map(lambda x: setitem(x, 1, -2), lol)
print(lol)
[[1, -2], [3, -2]]
It does the job on the spot, but you mostly use the map for side effects and create a None list:
In [1]: lol = [[1, 3], [3, 4]]
In [2]: from operator import setitem
In [3]: map(lambda x: setitem(x, 1, -2), lol)
Out[3]: [None, None]
In [4]: lol
Out[4]: [[1, -2], [3, -2]]
So really stick to your loop logic.
A simple loop is also more efficient:
In [13]: %%timeit
lol = [[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] for _ in range(100000)]
map(lambda x: setitem(x, 1, -2), lol)
....:
10 loops, best of 3: 45.4 ms per loop
In [14]:
In [14]: %%timeit
lol = [[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] for _ in range(100000)]
for sub in lol:
sub[1] = -2
....:
10 loops, best of 3: 31.7 ms per
. .. , i.e map(str.strip, iterable), , , , .