Geek Answers Handbook

Which Kinect SDK is more powerful in skeleton tracking? Open source sdk or official sdk?

I am interested in developing an AR application that needs a Kinect sensor to track the human body. This application will use skeleton tracking data to process real-time video on the human body. Because of this, I need a powerful, lively and fast skeletal SDK. Could you provide me the differences between these SDKs?

What did I find from the search? I did not find much information or direct answers about my question. I found that the OpenNI Framework supports the skeleton tracking algorithm. But I don’t know how it works, or if it will be useful with my application or not.

Here is some information I found from the search: enter image description here I am also interested in a general comparison of these SDKs.

In fact, I found a post in which a comparison was made between the two. And he wrote that openkinect is less effective at tracking skeleton. But this post was written in 2011.

Official Kinect SDK vs. Open Source Alternatives

Could you help me?

+4
source share
1 answer

You really answered your question:

  • OpenKinect / libfreenect does not provide skeleton tracking.
  • OpenNI provides skeleton tracking through its own NiTE.
  • Microsoft SDK , , NiTE.

OpenNI. (, OpenCV PCL ) -.
NiTE , (PrimeSense) ( Apple ).

+4

More articles:


All Articles