If in java-byte-code the optimization of multiplication / bitrate will be visible

Question

I continue to read that bit-lifting is not needed, since compiler optimization will translate multiplication by bit-shift. For example, Do I have to shift the bit to split by 2 in Java? and is bit offset faster than multiplication and division in Java? .NET?

I am not asking here about the difference in performance, I could check it myself. But what seems curious to me is that several people mention that it will be "compiled into the same thing." This seems to be not the case. I wrote a small piece of code.

private static void multi()
{
    int a = 3;
    int b = a * 2;
    System.out.println(b);
}

private static void shift()
{
    int a = 3;
    int b = a << 1L;
    System.out.println(b);
}

Which gives the same result and just prints it.

When I look at the generated Java bytecode, the following is displayed.

private static void multi();
Code:
   0: iconst_3
   1: istore_0
   2: iload_0
   3: iconst_2
   4: imul
   5: istore_1
   6: getstatic     #4                  // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
   9: iload_1
  10: invokevirtual #5                  // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(I)V
  13: return

private static void shift();
Code:
   0: iconst_3
   1: istore_0
   2: iload_0
   3: iconst_1
   4: ishl
   5: istore_1
   6: getstatic     #4                  // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream;
   9: iload_1
  10: invokevirtual #5                  // Method java/io/PrintStream.println:(I)V
  13: return

"imul" "ishl".

: , - java. , , ? , , Java, JVM imul - , - . , , .

( , . , , , , Java, ++, . , ).

Answer 1

, . , " ", . -.

, - Java . - , . , - Java . Java Java - "".

_{(, , . - - Java-. ( !), , , .}

, , , JIT (Just-In-Time-Compiler) . Just-In-Time -.

, , . , System.out.println , - . , 1, 2, . , shl ( ) multi, , , add multi - shift.

, 8, 256:

class BitShiftOptimization
{
    public static void main(String args[])
    {
        int blackHole = 0;
        for (int i=0; i<1000000; i++)
        {
            blackHole += testMulti(i);
            blackHole += testShift(i);
        }
        System.out.println(blackHole);

    }

    public static int testMulti(int a)
    {
        int b = a * 256;
        return b;
    }

    public static int testShift(int a)
    {
        int b = a << 8L;
        return b;
    }
}

( , , . , JIT. . , , , )

java -server -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+TraceClassLoading -XX:+LogCompilation -XX:+PrintInlining -XX:+PrintAssembly BitShiftOptimization

testMulti:

Decoding compiled method 0x000000000286fbd0:
Code:
[Entry Point]
[Verified Entry Point]
[Constants]
  # {method} {0x000000001c0003b0} 'testMulti' '(I)I' in 'BitShiftOptimization'
  # parm0:    rdx       = int
  #           [sp+0x40]  (sp of caller)
  0x000000000286fd20: mov    %eax,-0x6000(%rsp)
  0x000000000286fd27: push   %rbp
  0x000000000286fd28: sub    $0x30,%rsp
  0x000000000286fd2c: movabs $0x1c0005a8,%rax   ;   {metadata(method data for {method} {0x000000001c0003b0} 'testMulti' '(I)I' in 'BitShiftOptimization')}
  0x000000000286fd36: mov    0xdc(%rax),%esi
  0x000000000286fd3c: add    $0x8,%esi
  0x000000000286fd3f: mov    %esi,0xdc(%rax)
  0x000000000286fd45: movabs $0x1c0003a8,%rax   ;   {metadata({method} {0x000000001c0003b0} 'testMulti' '(I)I' in 'BitShiftOptimization')}
  0x000000000286fd4f: and    $0x1ff8,%esi
  0x000000000286fd55: cmp    $0x0,%esi
  0x000000000286fd58: je     0x000000000286fd70  ;*iload_0
                        ; - BitShiftOptimization::testMulti@0 (line 17)

  0x000000000286fd5e: shl    $0x8,%edx
  0x000000000286fd61: mov    %rdx,%rax
  0x000000000286fd64: add    $0x30,%rsp
  0x000000000286fd68: pop    %rbp
  0x000000000286fd69: test   %eax,-0x273fc6f(%rip)        # 0x0000000000130100
                        ;   {poll_return}
  0x000000000286fd6f: retq   
  0x000000000286fd70: mov    %rax,0x8(%rsp)
  0x000000000286fd75: movq   $0xffffffffffffffff,(%rsp)
  0x000000000286fd7d: callq  0x000000000285f160  ; OopMap{off=98}
                        ;*synchronization entry
                        ; - BitShiftOptimization::testMulti@-1 (line 17)
                        ;   {runtime_call}
  0x000000000286fd82: jmp    0x000000000286fd5e
  0x000000000286fd84: nop
  0x000000000286fd85: nop
  0x000000000286fd86: mov    0x2a8(%r15),%rax
  0x000000000286fd8d: movabs $0x0,%r10
  0x000000000286fd97: mov    %r10,0x2a8(%r15)
  0x000000000286fd9e: movabs $0x0,%r10
  0x000000000286fda8: mov    %r10,0x2b0(%r15)
  0x000000000286fdaf: add    $0x30,%rsp
  0x000000000286fdb3: pop    %rbp
  0x000000000286fdb4: jmpq   0x0000000002859420  ;   {runtime_call}
  0x000000000286fdb9: hlt    
  0x000000000286fdba: hlt    
  0x000000000286fdbb: hlt    
  0x000000000286fdbc: hlt    
  0x000000000286fdbd: hlt    
  0x000000000286fdbe: hlt    

( testShift ).

  0x000000000286fd5e: shl    $0x8,%edx

8.