EDIT: I commented on the misleading answer below, but the answer is that you only need 32-bit redistributable files, as Karel Petranek answered first.
This is not an answer. It should be only a comment, but since I do not have the necessary reputation for this ...:
I just wanted to warn people against the information provided by Ruel. No, the distributed 64-bit Visual C ++ packages also do not include 32-bit DLLs.
I even tested this (my) theory. I tried to run an application that required 32-bit Visual C ++ 2010 redistributable files, and it prompted me that I needed it. Then I installed the 64-bit version, and it still suggested that she needed the 32-bit version of Visual C ++ 2010. After installing the 32-bit version, it worked.
Why do people come up with theories and give them as answers, defeats me. Or perhaps the reputation system also "encouraged" him to provide not only redundant, but also false information. Or maybe he just confused C ++ with the distributable DirectX 9 (which install both 32-bit and 64-bit DLLs).
bitoolean
source share