W3C widgets dead?

Someone recently directed me to the W3C specification for widgets:

http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/

Developers can disable web applications offline through the browser cache. I asked how users should know that they can use certain websites offline, namely when the user raised the widget specification. It makes sense to split application packaging apart from the stand-alone storage ability. However, after searching and reading on widgets, I could not find the latest articles on this issue (most of the articles seemed to be around 2010). In the end, I found the Opera SDK, but in the beginning I got a message saying that they removed the functionality:

Starting with Opera 12, Opera widgets will be disabled for new users and completely removed in a later release.

source: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/creating-your-first-opera-widget/

Are W3C widgets dead technology? And if so, is there any cross-browser technology for packaging web applications? I am curious because I think that offline storage is interesting, but I don’t see how users will know that even when they don’t have an Internet connection, they can view a specific URL and work if the browser didn’t tell them which applications they are installed (or if each site supporting offline storage explained to them).

+8
html5 web-applications w3c application-cache web-widget
source share

No one has answered this question yet.

See related questions:

411
Is there a valid W3C way to disable autocomplete in HTML form?
25
Web cache manifest manifest limit
nineteen
Is 5MB the actual limit for W3C Web Storage?
8
Using web technology to create desktop applications
2
How to get along with standalone HTML5 applications when WebSQL is deprecated?
2
Does Dart support the W3C API file standard?
one
Prevent HTML5 application content validation event while loading a standalone application
0
Create email from a web application on iPhone
0
Chrome Packed Background App Functionality and Behavior
0
Is the HTML5 Web Storage API still offline?

All Articles