Is Meteor JS flexible for a full stack structure?

Question

I read some interesting articles and comparisons in the JavaScript MV * framework, and I know the architecture scheme of the most popular (Ember, Backbone, Angular). However, as a PHP programmer (and Symfony 2 lover) who wants to study one of them in detail, I am concerned that Meteor (my first choice) is flexible enough to be considered the full stack structure, so I can completely abandon the server side ( e.g. PHP) in major applications . Until today, I thought that PHP + Angular provides more options (although it takes more time to support both server side and client side), however I would like you to speak out about this. From what I saw in the meteorite screencast, it seems pretty amazing.

Answer 1

Like many people, server-side JS will completely replace the PHP function. But the Meteor is something more; it allows you to replace your imperative code with declarative code. The meteor takes over the synchronization of data, and you just decide how to do it. No more passing messages through AJAX. As one article said, Meteor made MVC obsolete .

In my experience with a meteorite, I am developing a project and reading a book . What I was able to do with Meteor in a short time completely blew my mind. Combined with some excellent frontend frameworks such as bootstrap, I really don't need to do any CSS work (if I don't want it), and that means I can evolve without worrying about styling or AJAX, essentially freeing up my time to create amazing applications with very few problems.

In addition, as they say, only a weekend is required to exit the Meteor. It is not difficult if you have JS experience. However, since I needed to understand a little, I no longer need to think with MVC. It took me just a couple of days to build my first meteorite app, so I suggest you give it a try!