No, I think it is not yet supported (1.1.2 as a record). I guess the main reasons
The local private registry is not a mirror of the general registry, so the logical one is not that if it cannot be found locally, then it goes on public display. They are completely different.
Therefore, if we set up our own docker repository, but keep the same name, it will be corrupted.
When you run docker images and you see ubuntu , how do you know that this is from your local private registry or public.
UPDATE: add one example example
Also, if we have a Dockerfile , put tomcatit as the base
tomcat7 FROM tomcat7
How do you know that this assembly is happening?
If we want to have a strict process or control over the mapping between a private repo and a public repo, this will be difficult.
Technically itβs possible, but get less. This frees the power of the docker (community)
This is a similar case for another package system that requires a unique name for the package.
Larry cai
source share