I think it might be too early to expect large CDNs to start doing this. When a sufficient number of sites uses the library, the advantages become clear: greater availability, more frequent use, reduced client requests, increased productivity for the end user. If only a few sites use it, the likelihood that a client who has a copy in their cache is already low, and all performance improvements are lost. So all that remains is that MS and Google offset your bandwidth costs, which is not their intention. So the solution is to get more developers to use the library.
Plus the library is so tiny. The code is still only 3.5 KB using a conservative estimate. For comparison, jQuery is 24K and ext-core is 29K. I personally recommend folding the library into my own JS site database and improving performance. At least until there is wider adoption.
Plus, itโs funny that I expected the JSON library to be hosted also on Yahoo, but I canโt find it. I mean Crockford works there.
Andrew Jun 08 '10 at 6:14 2010-06-08 06:14
source share