I noticed that some places open at google.com/maps look completely different from the same view generated using the Google Maps Javascript API 3 using tilt: 45 .
In the example of the center of the map lat : 39.073282988412444 lng : -77.15641707252614
So, what does it look like in google.com/maps using hybrid and 3d mode (not sure if it matches tilt: "45" ):

And here is what it looks like on my website using the Google Maps Javascript API 3 in hybrid tilt: 45 mode:

As you can see, the quality of poor use when using the API. Google Maps uses something like 3D rendering, which is not available through the API.
So my question . Does this mean that we (API clients) cannot achieve the same quality as on google.com/maps ? Because I believe that everyone thinks that he can embed the same map as on google.com/maps via the API, but in fact it seems that you are getting a better service.
PS: I noticed that google.com/maps probably uses WebGL:

javascript google-maps google-maps-api-3
Zuzel
source share