Pragmatism and accessibility

Question

At what point does accessibility become pragmatic? and what is this shadow gray area dictated by?

Answer 1

It depends on your software. Making the word processor available is much more necessary to make the latest first-person shooter available. As a blind computer user, I get angry if Microsoft Office isn’t working, but I don’t care if I can navigate the menu in Quake III. It also depends on your customers: if you sell to the government, and accessibility will be authorized (at least in America). However, for most non-governmental companies, accessibility is not provided, so you can get rid of the same or less accessibility as your conscience, time limits, and budgetary power that you must realize.

Answer 2

My hunch is that as the legislature catches up with us, we not only do not have legal accessibility requirements, but also physical buildings, jobs, etc. must adhere to accessibility requirements. Such legislation often removes doubts.

Since accessibility as a whole means providing services to as many people as possible, no site is publicly accessible, not even worthily encompassing all languages. This is generally accepted in order to adhere to several major languages ​​or countries, although it is good to develop for expansion (as Amazon does).

With regard to disability, sometimes it depends on the site and the services provided.

I personally think that with the age of the population it makes sense to contact clients with a low level of vision who use assistive devices, so text-based websites and low-based flash / scripts make a lot of sense. However, users with small mobile devices have similar needs, so you can catch two birds.