Geek Answers Handbook

Which WYSIWYG editor is best for a content management site?

The editor I need should be easy to use. Even for people who have absolutely no knowledge of HTML

Projects I tried:

I'm looking for:

  • An editor such as the TinyMCE editor with a live view like on the stackoverflow site.
  • The way to insert images and their placement in the article.

EDIT: The best solution I'm thinking of now is to use:

  1. TinyMCE for the WYSIWYG editor.

  2. Write your own code that will show it. live in real article format.

  3. Write an Ajax code that will upload the photos to the site, and then the editor can organize them into articles based on their identifier / name.

What do you think of the solution? Maybe you have an idea?

+7
wysiwyg html-editor
source share
8 answers

StackOverflow uses Markdown , and WMD Editor

Markdown is a very good way to create valid HTML, but its list of functions is much shorter than TinyMCE Editor. This can be very useful for your users if they do not need additional features.

Other options you might consider:

+6
source share

I liked using WYMeditor on the sites we create using ExpressionEngine (CMS).

Pros:

  • does not allow invalid xhtml
  • allows you to specify a stylesheet for list rules so that the user can easily apply styles to the content
  • looking at the code for those who know html / css and need to configure something.
  • supports image placement (not sure if you can upload it, although the CMS we use has its own utility for downloading files).
  • he passed the mom / client test for us without fail

Minuses:

  • will not allow invalid xhtml ... sometimes you really really REALLY want to just stop using the <center> Tag
+2
source share

I use Telerik RadEditor in my CMS. It is VERY robust and has several connection points that allow you to expand the functionality to meet your needs. It does not have (afaik) a real-time view similar to that used by one StackOverflow, but it could possibly have been added if you wanted to.

However, it does provide a photo upload / post function that you mention, besides the fact that you can upload documents and some other media. The downside is that the controls are pretty expensive, around $ 1,000, I think. Fortunately, my company covers the costs :)

+2
source share

I like the Telerik editor. It is not free, but it is very nice and their support is excellent.

+2
source share

I used CKEditor and tinyMCE; I am using CKEditor now. If this matters to you, I had to change the CKEditor source code three times, and each time it was a pleasant experience. The code is well documented.

CKEditor has released several versions in previous weeks; The latest version fixes an issue where I needed to change the source code.

+1
source share

Ive used TinyMCE and have enjoyed it so far.

The benefits . Ease of use does not require HTML, but you can switch to the html view if you want. You can change styles and fonts and much more that CMS will require.

Against . However, there is no way to upload photos with him. It uses the same style as the markdown here on SO. It can include only external images.

0
source share

heres , which uses any blog editor to edit content. If users take site support seriously, it’s not wise to force them to install software if they are going to make their experience much better than the JS editor

0
source share

I had to create a CMS from scratch a few years ago. I went through so many options, tore TinyMCE into pieces, also tried CKEditor, etc. Etc. I really liked Summernote and I ended up using it. It seems that the most frameless option at that time worked flawlessly.

https://summernote.org/

If you think about it, I could use this in my next project.

0
source share

More articles:


All Articles