This is not a question of the number plurality in another database, but about the expression of a product in this database
Let's start with a very simple base, unary, which is expressed only in units (not even zeros)
6x9 in the unary state 111111 x 111111111. We can perform this calculation by replacing all units in one member with units in another member. copy and paste nine six times
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
When we want to express this number in more convenient bases, we group them by radius. If there are enough groups to group groups, we group them. we then replace the group numbers with numbers. We will do it in decimal form.
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Each arrow represents a group of 10, and 4 remain, so in dozens of places we put 5, and in them - 4, 54.
allows you to do the same for a small base, so we can get an idea of ββhow to generalize groups of groups:
1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 2 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 4 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 8 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 16 ^ ^ ^ 32 ^
We could do groups five times. starting from one place, we wonβt leave there after we have grouped two, so the first digit is 0. When we are grouped by 4, there remains a group of 2 remaining, so the next digit is 1. When we grouped by 8, the group remains of the remaining 4, the other 1 is the next digit. when we grouped by 16, there was one remaining group of 8. when grouped by 32, there remained a group of 16. we cannot create a group up to 64, so all digits for places above 32 are 0. Therefore, the binary representation will be
110110
finally base 13. it's as simple as base 10
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ^ ^ ^ ^
there are 4 groups of 13. after we make these 4 groups, there are two numbers left. thus, the product 6 x 9, if presented in base 13, is equal to "42"